TAV-in-SAV for surgical bioprosthetic valve failure
TAVI
Case-based Discussion
Room 3
Anchorperson: Sabine Bleiziffer
Spokesperson: Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Procedural Analysts: Radoslaw Parma, Liesbeth Rosseel
Discussants: Danny Dvir, Isaac George, Yohei Ohno, Radoslaw Parma
Watch this session if you want
- To appreciate the key information you need to know about a failed surgical bioprosthesis before considering a valve-in-valve procedure
- To learn how to avoid high gradients and patient-prosthesis mismatch after valve-in-valve procedures
- To understand the clinical relevance of trans-valve gradient measurements
Welcome and session objectives
Sabine Bleiziffer
Case presentation
Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Gradients and mismatch – the Achilles heel of valve-in-valve procedures
Danny Dvir
The characteristics of surgical bioprostheses and the role of re-do surgery
Magdalena Erlebach
Discussion and audience interaction
Liesbeth Rosseel
Expansion of contemporary surgical bioprostheses
Sabine Bleiziffer
Discussion and audience interaction
Procedural measures to avoid gradients and mismatch
Radoslaw Parma
BEV vs. SEV - RCT data and the relevance of valve gradients
Amr Abbas
Live poll: how would you treat my patient?
Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Session evaluation and key learnings
Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Suggested videos
8:13
